Queen Arwa University

Sanaa, Yemen · Member ID: 38093 · 340 total works

Global Rank

#2,726

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 10%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2724Neotropical Ornithological Society(38 pts)#2725LLC "Medical Knowledge and Technologies"(38 pts)#2727Hong Bang International University(38 pts)#2728El Colegio del Estado de Hidalgo(38 pts)

Nexus Score

38/ 100

Stable vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#4,617

41 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,726

299 works

Ranked #4,617 for recent publications vs #2,726 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

16.1 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

0.4 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.4 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

1.8 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

17.0 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	42	D	76%	2%	5%	11%	99%
Edited Books	11	F	0%	25%	0%	0%	30%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	73%	11.0 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	76%	3.8 / 5	Good
ORCID Coverage people	2%	0.5 / 20	Poor
Affiliations (Text) organizations	34%	1.7 / 5	Needs Work
ROR IDs organizations	29%	2.9 / 10	Needs Work
Funder Registry funding	7%	0.7 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	7%	0.7 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	80%	5.6 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	76%	5.3 / 7	Good
Abstracts access	83%	5.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve People

+16 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 2% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+14 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 9% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+10 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 16% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Queen Arwa University

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve People

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Increase ORCID Coverage

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Crossmark

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results