Onroerend Erfgoed

Brussel, Belgium · Member ID: 34168 · 817 total works

Global Rank

#3,143

of 28,379

Percentile

Top 11%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#3141Real Centro Universitario Escorial-Maria Cristina(36 pts)#3142Campus Educa Sportis(36 pts)#3144Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Provinsi Jambi(36 pts)#3145Instituto Fe y Libertad(36 pts)

Nexus Score

36/ 100

+9 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,971

89 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#3,143

728 works

Ranked #3,971 for recent publications vs #3,143 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

9.7 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

14.6 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

11.6 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

0.0 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
ReportsTOP	38	D	26%	90%	92%	0%	0%
Books	33	F	0%	88%	100%	0%	0%
Journal Articles	26	F	38%	49%	42%	0%	0%
Report Series	19	F	7%	24%	80%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	83%	12.5 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	75%	15.1 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	56%	2.8 / 5	Good
ROR IDs organizations	100%	10.0 / 10	Excellent
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	0%	0.0 / 6	Poor

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+16 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+10 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 39% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Onroerend Erfgoed

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Access

Improve Provenance

Improvement Recommendations

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Abstracts

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results