Universite de Limoges

Limoges, Limoges Cedex, France · Member ID: 33468 · 2,411 total works

Global Rank

#9,129

of 28,733

Percentile

Top 32%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+15

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#9127Sociedad Boliviana de Cirugia Plastica(22 pts)#9128Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Mandala Waluya(22 pts)#9130Publishing House International Enterprise(22 pts)#9131Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Terpadu Nurul Fikri(22 pts)

Nexus Score

22/ 100

+3 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#10,216

683 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#9,129

1,728 works

Ranked #10,216 for recent publications vs #9,129 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

10.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

3.8 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

4.8 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

3.8 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	26	F	47%	21%	36%	0%	21%
Proceedings	24	F	46%	3%	49%	0%	22%
Monographs	12	F	0%	6%	31%	0%	30%
Book Chapters	6	F	18%	2%	6%	0%	3%
Journal Issues	2	F	0%	1%	14%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	66%	9.9 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	24%	4.8 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	77%	3.9 / 5	Good
ROR IDs organizations	9%	0.9 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	71%	4.3 / 6	Good

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+12 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 19% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+12 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 19% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Universite de Limoges

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Increase ORCID Coverage

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results