RN Score

Institucion Universitaria Antonio Jose Camacho

Cali, Valle, Colombia · Member ID: 32300 · 263 total works

Nexus Score

37/ 100
D
+3 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#4,168

39

100 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,912

35

163 works

Ranked #4,168 for recent publications vs #2,912 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

12.9 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

5.2 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.3 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

16.8 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
Journal ArticlesTOP40D
Edited Books26F
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

47%
7.0 / 15Needs Work

Update Policies

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

Similarity Check

provenance

82%
4.1 / 5Excellent

ORCID Coverage

people

41%
8.2 / 20Needs Work

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

44%
2.2 / 5Needs Work

ROR IDs

organizations

24%
2.4 / 10Needs Work

Funder Registry

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Award Numbers

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Licenses

access

57%
4.0 / 7Good

Full-text Links

access

82%
5.7 / 7Excellent

Abstracts

access

85%
5.1 / 6Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

2

Improve People

+11 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 26% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Organizations

+10 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 15% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 9 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
3/28/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.