punctum books

Goleta, CA, United States · Member ID: 31179 · 1,978 total works

Global Rank

#1,670

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 6%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#1668Uluslararasi Bankacilik, Ekonomi ve Yonetim Arastirmalari Dergisi(44 pts)#1669Istanbul Technical University(44 pts)#1671Junta de Decanos de Colegios de Contadores Publicos del Peru(44 pts)#1672Milliyetcilik Arastirmalari Dergisi-Journal of Nationalism Studies(44 pts)

Nexus Score

42/ 100

+13 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#1,251

295 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#1,670

1,683 works

Ranked #1,251 for recent publications vs #1,670 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

8.8 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

7.8 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

11.1 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

2.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

12.1 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Edited BooksTOP	50	C	35%	45%	75%	6%	100%
Monographs	48	D	40%	32%	72%	7%	99%
Books	45	D	20%	41%	76%	0%	100%
Book Chapters	34	F	19%	28%	76%	7%	53%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	81%	12.2 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	21%	1.1 / 5	Needs Work
ORCID Coverage people	52%	10.3 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	73%	3.7 / 5	Good
ROR IDs organizations	72%	7.2 / 10	Good
Funder Registry funding	27%	2.8 / 10	Needs Work
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	21%	1.5 / 7	Needs Work
Abstracts access	44%	2.6 / 6	Needs Work

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+14 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 10% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+11 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 35% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+8 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 39% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

punctum books

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Add Full-Text URLs

Enable Crossmark

Increase ORCID Coverage

Add Funder Information

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results