Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations

Christiansburg, VA, United States · Member ID: 30038 · 14 total works

Global Rank

#10,621

of 28,501

Percentile

Top 37%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+17

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#10619Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Sosial Politik Wira Bhakti(20 pts)#10620Elisabeth Health Jurnal STIKes Santa Elisabeth Medan(20 pts)#10622Jurnal Ilmiah Among Makarti, STIE AMA Salatiga(20 pts)#10623Journal of University of Science and Technology of China(20 pts)

Nexus Score

20/ 100

Stable vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#12,292

2 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#10,621

12 works

Ranked #12,292 for recent publications vs #10,621 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

0.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

12.5 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.8 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

4.0 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	0%	0.0 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	50%	10.0 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	50%	2.5 / 5	Good
ROR IDs organizations	50%	5.0 / 10	Good
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	50%	3.0 / 6	Good

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+20 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+12 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 20% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Funding

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Award/Grant Numbers

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results