RN Score

Embrapa Florestas

Colombo, PR, Brazil · Member ID: 2979 · 670 total works

Nexus Score

48/ 100
D
+39 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#199

67

33 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#770

28

637 works

Ranked #199 for recent publications vs #770 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

14.1 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

12.9 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.4 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

4.0 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

16.2 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
Journal ArticlesTOP30F
Proceedings5F
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

100%
15.0 / 15Excellent

Update Policies

provenance

3%
0.1 / 5Poor

Similarity Check

provenance

91%
4.5 / 5Excellent

ORCID Coverage

people

100%
20.0 / 20Excellent

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

3%
0.1 / 5Poor

ROR IDs

organizations

3%
0.3 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

39%
3.9 / 10Needs Work

Award Numbers

funding

30%
3.0 / 10Needs Work

Licenses

access

100%
7.0 / 7Excellent

Full-text Links

access

100%
7.0 / 7Excellent

Abstracts

access

100%
6.0 / 6Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

2

Improve Funding

+12 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 20% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Provenance

+6 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 56% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
4/15/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.