Revista Ciencia & Tecnologia

Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil · Member ID: 29775 · 293 total works

Global Rank

#6,129

of 28,501

Percentile

Top 22%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+11

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#6127International Institute of Social History(26 pts)#6128Universitas Malikussaleh(26 pts)#6130International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies(26 pts)#6131Messenger of Armenian State University of Economics, Armenian State University of Economics(26 pts)

Nexus Score

26/ 100

-8 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#11,211

140 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#6,129

153 works

Ranked #11,211 for recent publications vs #6,129 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

3.8 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

7.6 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

14.5 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	43	D	24%	83%	0%	0%	100%
Proceedings	19	F	12%	13%	0%	0%	65%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	5%	0.8 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	48%	2.4 / 5	Needs Work
ORCID Coverage people	36%	7.3 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	30%	2.1 / 7	Needs Work
Full-text Links access	48%	3.4 / 7	Needs Work
Abstracts access	97%	5.8 / 6	Excellent

Your journal articles score 43 (Grade D) — strong work on your primary research outputs! The tips below reflect your aggregate coverage across all content types, where there's still room to grow.

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+16 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 15% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Revista Ciencia & Tecnologia

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results