RN Score

The Korean Society for Plant Biotechnology

Daejeon, South Korea · Member ID: 2921 · 1,113 total works

Nexus Score

45/ 100
D
+22 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#845

56

79 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#1,390

34

1,034 works

Ranked #845 for recent publications vs #1,390 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

23.1 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

0.0 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.5 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

8.7 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

9.3 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

99%
14.8 / 15Excellent

Update Policies

provenance

100%
5.0 / 5Excellent

Similarity Check

provenance

95%
4.8 / 5Excellent

ORCID Coverage

people

0%
0.0 / 20Poor

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

99%
4.9 / 5Excellent

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

70%
7.0 / 10Good

Award Numbers

funding

54%
5.4 / 10Good

Licenses

access

97%
6.8 / 7Excellent

Full-text Links

access

97%
6.8 / 7Excellent

Abstracts

access

0%
0.0 / 6Poor

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve People

+16 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

2

Improve Organizations

+9 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 23% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Funding

+7 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 43% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
4/22/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.