Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Ukraine · Member ID: 29168 · 237 total works

Global Rank

#2,301

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 8%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2299Melanoma Research Alliance(40 pts)#2300Keysight Technologies UK Ltd(40 pts)#2302Revista Thesis(40 pts)#2303Programa de Historia das Ciencias e das Tecnicas e Epistemologia(40 pts)

Nexus Score

40/ 100

Stable vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#4,133

89 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,301

148 works

Ranked #4,133 for recent publications vs #2,301 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

11.9 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

14.7 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

4.8 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

8.4 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	43	D	53%	80%	33%	0%	43%
Monographs	26	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Books	26	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Edited Books	26	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	30%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	62%	9.3 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	31%	1.6 / 5	Needs Work
ORCID Coverage people	63%	12.6 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	61%	3.0 / 5	Good
ROR IDs organizations	24%	2.4 / 10	Needs Work
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	31%	2.2 / 7	Needs Work
Full-text Links access	31%	2.2 / 7	Needs Work
Abstracts access	97%	5.8 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+8 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 47% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+8 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 42% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Crossmark

Deposit Complete References

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results