University Library J. C. Senckenberg

Frankfurt am Main, Germany · Member ID: 28464 · 6,107 total works

Global Rank

#9,795

of 28,501

Percentile

Top 34%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+17

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#9793Jurusan Ekonomi Pembangunan Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Pattimura(21 pts)#9794Municipal Academy of Circus and Variety Arts(21 pts)#9796International Journal of Martial Arts(21 pts)#9797Masyarakat Limnologi Indonesia(21 pts)

Nexus Score

20/ 100

+3 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#11,520

795 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#9,795

5,312 works

Ranked #11,520 for recent publications vs #9,795 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

5.3 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

2.5 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

12.7 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	21	F	22%	12%	0%	0%	63%
Proceedings	11	F	0%	50%	0%	0%	4%
Reports	9	F	0%	19%	2%	0%	25%
Dissertations	9	F	0%	17%	0%	0%	30%
Monographs	6	F	0%	3%	1%	0%	27%
Books	6	F	0%	12%	0%	0%	16%
Book Chapters	6	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	30%
Edited Books	6	F	0%	7%	0%	0%	24%
Report Series	2	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	10%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	11%	1.6 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	78%	3.9 / 5	Good
ORCID Coverage people	13%	2.5 / 20	Poor
Affiliations (Text) organizations	1%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	1%	0.1 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	43%	3.0 / 7	Needs Work
Full-text Links access	78%	5.5 / 7	Good
Abstracts access	85%	5.1 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+15 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 21% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+14 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 12% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

University Library J. C. Senckenberg

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Increase ORCID Coverage

Deposit Complete References

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results