Institut Catala d Arqueologia Classica, ICAC

Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain · Member ID: 28407 · 566 total works

Global Rank

#150

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 1%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#148National Medical Research Center of Hematology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation(59 pts)#149Centre d Estudis Demografics (CED)(59 pts)#151Lviv Medical Institute LLC(59 pts)#152Shakarim University(59 pts)

Nexus Score

58/ 100

+6 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#337

43 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#150

523 works

Ranked #337 for recent publications vs #150 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

12.8 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

18.1 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

16.1 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

11.4 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
ReportsTOP	66	B	56%	97%	0%	98%	65%
Book Chapters	53	C	54%	80%	0%	69%	48%
Monographs	50	C	51%	96%	0%	41%	48%
Edited Books	49	D	18%	100%	0%	67%	53%
Books	33	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	65%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	84%	12.6 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	95%	19.1 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	88%	8.8 / 10	Excellent
Award Numbers funding	86%	8.6 / 10	Excellent
Licenses access	95%	6.7 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	98%	5.9 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+7 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 51% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+5 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 57% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Institut Catala d Arqueologia Classica, ICAC

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Organizations

Improve Provenance

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Author Affiliations

Enable Crossmark

Enable Similarity Check

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results