Cantonal and University Library Fribourg

Fribourg, FR, Switzerland · Member ID: 28283 · 5,762 total works

Global Rank

#5,675

of 28,379

Percentile

Top 20%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+10

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#5673International Seminar on Urban Form(27 pts)#5674Uluslararasi Disiplinler Arasi Dil Arastirmalari Dergisi(27 pts)#5676Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research(27 pts)#5677International Association of Management Spirituality & Religion(27 pts)

Nexus Score

27/ 100

+9 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#6,286

854 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#5,675

4,908 works

Ranked #6,286 for recent publications vs #5,675 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

6.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

3.1 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.5 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

17.5 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
ProceedingsTOP	51	C	20%	60%	90%	0%	100%
Dissertations	41	D	15%	32%	92%	0%	84%
Reports	35	D	12%	32%	82%	0%	66%
Database	35	D	0%	100%	100%	0%	0%
Monographs	34	F	10%	50%	50%	0%	68%
Datasets	34	F	80%	0%	0%	0%	70%
Journal Articles	24	F	23%	6%	0%	0%	87%
Proceedings	18	F	20%	0%	0%	0%	66%
Report Series	8	F	0%	0%	43%	0%	10%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	12%	1.8 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	96%	4.8 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	28%	5.7 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	4%	0.2 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	6%	0.6 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	95%	6.7 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	96%	6.8 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	83%	5.0 / 6	Excellent

Your proceedings score 51 (Grade C) — strong work on your primary research outputs! The tips below reflect your aggregate coverage across all content types, where there's still room to grow.

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+14 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 24% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+13 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 16% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Cantonal and University Library Fribourg

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Increase ORCID Coverage

Add Funder Information

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Include Award/Grant Numbers

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results