Melanoma Research Alliance

Washington, DC, United States · Member ID: 28092 · 542 total works

Global Rank

#2,299

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 8%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2297Revista Sergipana de Educacao Ambiental(40 pts)#2298National Organization for Human Services(40 pts)#2300Keysight Technologies UK Ltd(40 pts)#2301Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine(40 pts)

Nexus Score

40/ 100

+30 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#844

88 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,299

454 works

Ranked #844 for recent publications vs #2,299 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

0.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

11.3 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

8.3 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

20.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

0.0 / 20

Score by Content Type

All works are grant — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	0%	0.0 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	99%	19.8 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	99%	4.9 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	97%	9.7 / 10	Excellent
Funder Registry funding	100%	10.0 / 10	Excellent
Award Numbers funding	100%	10.0 / 10	Excellent
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	0%	0.0 / 6	Poor

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+20 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+16 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+5 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 56% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Melanoma Research Alliance

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Access

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Abstracts

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results