RN Score

Revista Internacional Educon

Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil · Member ID: 27664 · 112 total works

Nexus Score

43/ 100
D
-5 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,611

41

31 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#1,662

46

81 works

Ranked #3,611 for recent publications vs #1,662 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

5.7 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

4.2 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

13.9 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

19.6 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
Journal ArticlesTOP45D
Edited Books23F
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

10%
1.4 / 15Poor

Update Policies

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

Similarity Check

provenance

97%
4.8 / 5Excellent

ORCID Coverage

people

6%
1.3 / 20Poor

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

94%
4.7 / 5Excellent

ROR IDs

organizations

90%
9.0 / 10Excellent

Funder Registry

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Award Numbers

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Licenses

access

97%
6.8 / 7Excellent

Full-text Links

access

97%
6.8 / 7Excellent

Abstracts

access

100%
6.0 / 6Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

2

Improve Provenance

+14 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 23% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve People

+12 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 21% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
3/29/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.