Professionals On Line SAC

San Miguel, Lima, Peru · Member ID: 27081 · 457 total works

Global Rank

#1,828

of 28,364

Percentile

Top 6%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#1826Indian Association of Preventive and Social Medicine(43 pts)#1827Alianza de Investigadores Internacionales SAS(43 pts)#1829Marifetname(43 pts)#1830Asociacion Colombiana de Ciencias Biologicas(43 pts)

Nexus Score

43/ 100

-3 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,432

138 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#1,828

319 works

Ranked #3,432 for recent publications vs #1,828 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

9.6 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

16.4 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

17.1 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	51	C	51%	91%	0%	0%	100%
Posted Content	33	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	65%
Edited Books	26	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Books	24	F	0%	90%	0%	0%	30%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	22%	3.4 / 15	Needs Work
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	84%	4.2 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	84%	16.8 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	88%	6.1 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	84%	5.9 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	88%	5.3 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+11 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 38% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Professionals On Line SAC

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve Provenance

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results