Archeologicky ustav AV CR, Brno, v. v. i.

Brno, Czechia · Member ID: 26944 · 126 total works

Global Rank

#3,363

of 28,501

Percentile

Top 12%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#3361Kozigazgatasi es Infokommunikacios Jogi PhD Tanulmanyok(35 pts)#3362Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura(35 pts)#3364University of International Business(35 pts)#3365Escritas do Tempo - Revista do Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Historia da Unifesspa(35 pts)

Nexus Score

35/ 100

+7 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#4,513

61 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#3,363

65 works

Ranked #4,513 for recent publications vs #3,363 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

7.9 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

12.0 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

4.1 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

10.6 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	37	D	38%	54%	32%	0%	60%
Edited Books	29	F	47%	67%	0%	0%	20%
Monographs	26	F	3%	86%	14%	0%	30%
Book Chapters	18	F	20%	67%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	62%	9.3 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	2%	0.1 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	75%	15.1 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	56%	2.8 / 5	Good
ROR IDs organizations	15%	1.5 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	56%	3.9 / 7	Good
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	93%	5.6 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+12 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 32% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+8 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 27% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Archeologicky ustav AV CR, Brno, v. v. i.

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Add Funder Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Crossmark

Enable Similarity Check

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results