RN Score

Revista Praticas Educativas, Memorias e Oralidades

Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil · Member ID: 26730 · 1,107 total works

Nexus Score

26/ 100
F
+8 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#6,634

30

352 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#6,096

22

755 works

Ranked #6,634 for recent publications vs #6,096 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

5.3 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

10.4 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

10.2 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
Journal ArticlesTOP50C
Monographs10F
Edited Books1F
Books0F
Book Chapters0F
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

19%
2.9 / 15Poor

Update Policies

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

Similarity Check

provenance

61%
3.0 / 5Good

ORCID Coverage

people

61%
12.2 / 20Good

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Award Numbers

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Licenses

access

61%
4.3 / 7Good

Full-text Links

access

61%
4.3 / 7Good

Abstracts

access

61%
3.6 / 6Good
Your journal articles score 50 (Grade C) — strong work on your primary research outputs! The tips below reflect your aggregate coverage across all content types, where there's still room to grow.

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

2

Improve Provenance

+15 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 21% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 10 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
4/15/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.