World Resources Institute

Washington, DC, United States · Member ID: 26052 · 527 total works

Global Rank

#9,744

of 28,501

Percentile

Top 34%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+16

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#9742International Ayurvedic Medical Journal(21 pts)#9743REVISTA ENCONTROS TEOLOGICOS(21 pts)#9745Vladikavkaz Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences(21 pts)#9746University of Birmingham(21 pts)

Nexus Score

21/ 100

-5 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#13,884

203 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#9,744

324 works

Ranked #13,884 for recent publications vs #9,744 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

14.9 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

0.1 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.1 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

5.6 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	23	F	66%	0%	1%	0%	30%
Reports	2	F	0%	10%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	50%	7.5 / 15	Needs Work
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	96%	4.8 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	1%	0.2 / 20	Poor
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	2%	0.3 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	96%	5.8 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve People

+16 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 1% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 1% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

World Resources Institute

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve People

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Increase ORCID Coverage

Deposit Complete References

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results