Medknow

Mohali, India · Member ID: 2581 · 251,527 total works

Global Rank

#6,368

of 28,501

Percentile

Top 22%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+12

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#6366Japan Organization of Clinical Dermatologists(25 pts)#6367The Journal of Rheumatology(25 pts)#6369Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society(25 pts)#6370Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science(25 pts)

Nexus Score

25/ 100

+19 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#5,363

13,960 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#6,368

237,567 works

Ranked #5,363 for recent publications vs #6,368 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

18.7 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

0.3 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.6 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

3.6 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	17	F	56%	1%	5%	0%	11%
Journal Issues	3	F	10%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Journals	0	F	1%	0%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	94%	14.1 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	97%	4.8 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	99%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	3%	0.5 / 20	Poor
Affiliations (Text) organizations	96%	4.8 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	4%	0.3 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	81%	4.9 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve People

+16 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 2% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+12 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 18% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Medknow

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve People

Improve Funding

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Increase ORCID Coverage

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results