RN Score

AOSIS

Durbanville, South Africa · Member ID: 2580 · 49,363 total works

Nexus Score

42/ 100
D
+32 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#643

58

6,639 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#1,906

26

42,724 works

Ranked #643 for recent publications vs #1,906 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

15.4 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

9.5 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.9 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

13.0 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
MonographsTOP34F
Journal Articles30F
Edited Books29F
Book Chapters27F
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

88%
13.2 / 15Excellent

Update Policies

provenance

58%
2.9 / 5Good

Similarity Check

provenance

75%
3.8 / 5Good

ORCID Coverage

people

81%
16.2 / 20Excellent

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

54%
2.7 / 5Good

ROR IDs

organizations

50%
5.0 / 10Good

Funder Registry

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Award Numbers

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Licenses

access

84%
5.9 / 7Excellent

Full-text Links

access

54%
3.8 / 7Good

Abstracts

access

72%
4.3 / 6Good

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

2

Improve Organizations

+8 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 26% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve People

+7 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 47% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 8 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
5/18/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.