Natural Resources Canada/CMSS/Information Management

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada · Member ID: 2571 · 58,337 total works

Global Rank

#10,103

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 36%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+17

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#10101AACN Publishing(20 pts)#10102Korean Breast Cancer Society(20 pts)#10104The Korean Surgical Society(20 pts)#10105Japan Society of Kansei Engineering(20 pts)

Nexus Score

20/ 100

+12 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#8,079

428 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#10,103

57,909 works

Ranked #8,079 for recent publications vs #10,103 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

0.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

6.2 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.5 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

10.4 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Edited BooksTOP	26	F	0%	39%	66%	0%	41%
Reports	14	F	0%	10%	27%	0%	40%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	0%	0.0 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	51%	10.3 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	19%	1.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	19%	1.9 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	99%	6.9 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	96%	5.8 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+20 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+10 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 31% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Natural Resources Canada/CMSS/Information Management

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add Funder Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results