Universidad del Zulia

Maracaibo, Zulia, Venezuela · Member ID: 25670 · 4,021 total works

Global Rank

#592

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 2%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#590Medical Records - International Medical Journal(50 pts)#591International Society of Academicians(50 pts)#593Turkish Society for Geomorphology(50 pts)#594International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications(50 pts)

Nexus Score

49/ 100

+6 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#1,095

1,144 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#592

2,877 works

Ranked #1,095 for recent publications vs #592 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

17.8 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

16.8 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.9 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.1 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

11.9 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	49	D	71%	83%	20%	0%	60%
Edited Books	8	F	10%	25%	0%	0%	0%
Journal Issues	1	F	0%	3%	1%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	93%	14.0 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	93%	4.7 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	91%	18.3 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	40%	2.0 / 5	Needs Work
ROR IDs organizations	6%	0.6 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	1%	0.1 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	77%	5.4 / 7	Good
Full-text Links access	21%	1.5 / 7	Needs Work
Abstracts access	95%	5.7 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+9 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 19% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+4 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 59% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Universidad del Zulia

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Add Funder Information

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Add Full-Text URLs

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results