Noyam Publishers

La, Accra · Member ID: 25245 · 1,595 total works

Global Rank

#106

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 0%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#104Korean Society of Neurosonology(61 pts)#105Korean Society of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine(61 pts)#107Scientific Research Establishment of Innovations for Future LLC (Publications)(61 pts)#108International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Smart Technology of Korean Society for Precision Engineering(61 pts)

Nexus Score

61/ 100

+8 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#239

1,057 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#106

538 works

Ranked #239 for recent publications vs #106 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

24.1 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

18.0 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

6.1 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

12.6 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	63	C	99%	94%	44%	0%	64%
Edited Books	25	F	18%	75%	0%	0%	28%
Books	9	F	17%	0%	0%	0%	26%
Monographs	3	F	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	99%	14.9 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	98%	4.9 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	99%	19.9 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	24%	2.4 / 10	Needs Work
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	100%	6.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+6 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 40% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+3 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 63% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Noyam Publishers

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Add Funder Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results