Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.

Baech, Switzerland · Member ID: 2457 · 407,556 total works

Global Rank

#2,765

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 10%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2763College Publishing(37 pts)#2764IGI Global(37 pts)#2766Digital Journal of Opthalmology(37 pts)#2767The Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology(37 pts)

Nexus Score

37/ 100

+3 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#4,373

5,988 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,765

401,568 works

Ranked #4,373 for recent publications vs #2,765 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

17.1 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

3.3 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

4.7 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

11.6 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
ProceedingsTOP	38	D	72%	12%	33%	0%	65%
Journal Articles	36	D	71%	4%	32%	0%	62%
Books	5	F	0%	17%	8%	0%	0%
Monographs	2	F	0%	6%	5%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	84%	12.6 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	84%	4.2 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	30%	5.9 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	93%	4.7 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	84%	5.9 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	84%	5.1 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+13 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 17% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+7 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 31% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Increase ORCID Coverage

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Award/Grant Numbers

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results