High Rate Consulting Publications

Miami, FL, United States · Member ID: 22838 · 185 total works

Global Rank

#2,124

of 28,379

Percentile

Top 7%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2122Kharkiv Entomological Society(41 pts)#2123Asociacion Colombiana de Otorrinolaringologia(41 pts)#2125IMAIOS SAS(41 pts)#2126Turkish Journal of Special Education Research and Practice(41 pts)

Nexus Score

40/ 100

+6 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,256

88 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,124

97 works

Ranked #3,256 for recent publications vs #2,124 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

16.1 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

19.1 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

5.1 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	60	C	80%	100%	0%	0%	100%
Book Chapters	41	D	68%	100%	0%	0%	20%
Edited Books	32	F	43%	83%	1%	0%	23%
Monographs	16	F	50%	0%	0%	0%	15%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	86%	12.9 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	97%	4.8 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	97%	19.3 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	1%	0.1 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	11%	0.8 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	11%	0.8 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	76%	4.6 / 6	Good

Your journal articles score 60 (Grade C) — strong work on your primary research outputs! The tips below reflect your aggregate coverage across all content types, where there's still room to grow.

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+11 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 25% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

High Rate Consulting Publications

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Add Full-Text URLs

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results