ALUNA

Konstancin-Jeziorna, Poland · Member ID: 22436 · 4,622 total works

Global Rank

#6,651

of 28,608

Percentile

Top 23%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+13

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#6649Escuela Gallega de Administracion Publica - EGAP(25 pts)#6650Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia(25 pts)#6652IFES – Instituto Federal do Espirito Santo(25 pts)#6653Pakistan Society of Neurosurgeons(25 pts)

Nexus Score

24/ 100

+2 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#8,763

1,460 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#6,651

3,162 works

Ranked #8,763 for recent publications vs #6,651 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

11.7 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

2.2 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.7 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

6.8 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	25	F	51%	7%	28%	0%	33%
Monographs	6	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	30%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	55%	8.3 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	39%	1.9 / 5	Needs Work
ORCID Coverage people	21%	4.3 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	59%	2.9 / 5	Good
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	39%	2.7 / 7	Needs Work
Abstracts access	89%	5.3 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+14 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 11% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+9 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 34% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

ALUNA

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Increase ORCID Coverage

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results