Institute of Plant Protection of NAAS

Kiev, Kiev Region, Ukraine · Member ID: 22404 · 565 total works

Global Rank

#1,646

of 28,379

Percentile

Top 6%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#1644Revista Macambira(44 pts)#1645Asploro Open Access Publications(44 pts)#1647State Institution - Institute of regional research named after M.I. Dolishniy of NAS of Ukraine(44 pts)#1648Vasyl Stefanyk National Scientific Library of Ukraine in Lviv(44 pts)

Nexus Score

44/ 100

+22 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#838

192 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#1,646

373 works

Ranked #838 for recent publications vs #1,646 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

15.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

10.7 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

18.0 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	44	D	63%	44%	0%	0%	99%
Monographs	26	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Edited Books	23	F	0%	83%	0%	0%	30%
Books	21	F	0%	75%	0%	0%	30%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	91%	13.6 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	91%	4.6 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	91%	18.2 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	91%	6.4 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	91%	6.4 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	93%	5.6 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+5 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 60% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Institute of Plant Protection of NAAS

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve Provenance

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results