Central Research Institute for Epidemiology

Moscow, Moscow, Russia · Member ID: 22004 · 1,429 total works

Global Rank

#315

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 1%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#313Author Gate Publications(54 pts)#314FSBEI of Higher Education SamSMU of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation(54 pts)#316Federal Research and Clinical Center for Resuscitation and Rehabilitation(54 pts)#317International Library of Science(54 pts)

Nexus Score

54/ 100

+16 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#349

275 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#315

1,154 works

Ranked #349 for recent publications vs #315 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

21.8 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

13.5 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.6 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

18.2 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	55	C	94%	58%	2%	0%	100%
Books	6	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	30%
Edited Books	2	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	8%
Proceedings	1	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	7%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	94%	14.1 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	94%	4.7 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	94%	4.7 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	94%	18.8 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	21%	1.1 / 5	Needs Work
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	94%	6.6 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	94%	6.6 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	96%	5.8 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+11 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 4% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+3 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 67% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Central Research Institute for Epidemiology

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

Deposit Complete References

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results