Beilstein Institut

Frankfurt am Main, Germany · Member ID: 2086 · 7,688 total works

Global Rank

#73

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 0%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#71Treatise LLC(63 pts)#72Laboratory Medicine Online(62 pts)#74Korean Society of Community Nutrition(62 pts)#75Korean Stroke Society(62 pts)

Nexus Score

62/ 100

+25 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#44

994 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#73

6,694 works

Ranked #44 for recent publications vs #73 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

18.1 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

14.0 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

4.5 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

5.1 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

19.8 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	53	C	79%	45%	12%	13%	98%
Posted Content	45	D	20%	100%	0%	0%	100%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	84%	12.7 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	97%	19.5 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	84%	8.4 / 10	Excellent
Funder Registry funding	45%	4.5 / 10	Needs Work
Award Numbers funding	43%	4.3 / 10	Needs Work
Licenses access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	98%	5.9 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+11 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 25% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+8 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 30% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+2 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 72% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Beilstein Institut

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve Provenance

Improvement Recommendations

Include Author Affiliations

Enable Crossmark

Deposit Complete References

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results