RN Score

The Materials Research Society of Korea

Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, South Korea · Member ID: 2050 · 2,928 total works

Global Rank

#3,693

of 28,608

Percentile

Top 13%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nexus Score

33/ 100
F
+13 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#4,328

39

168 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#3,693

26

2,760 works

Ranked #4,328 for recent publications vs #3,693 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

24.2 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

5.1 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.1 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

1.4 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

0.0 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

100%
15.0 / 15Excellent

Update Policies

provenance

100%
5.0 / 5Excellent

Similarity Check

provenance

100%
5.0 / 5Excellent

ORCID Coverage

people

50%
10.0 / 20Good

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

83%
4.2 / 5Excellent

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Award Numbers

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Licenses

access

0%
0.0 / 7Poor

Full-text Links

access

0%
0.0 / 7Poor

Abstracts

access

0%
0.0 / 6Poor

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Access

+16 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

2

Improve Funding

+15 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

3

Improve People

+11 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 25% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 7 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
5/1/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.