Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology RAS

Moscow, Moscow, Russia · Member ID: 19716 · 1,202 total works

Global Rank

#5,615

of 28,379

Percentile

Top 20%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+10

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#5613The Association of Professors of English and Translation at Arab Universities - APETAU(27 pts)#5614LPPM Universitas Sari Mulia(27 pts)#5616Kyiv National Karpenko-Karyi University of Theater, Cinema and Television(27 pts)#5617Personality Development Center HUMANUS(27 pts)

Nexus Score

27/ 100

+7 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#6,281

291 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#5,615

911 works

Ranked #6,281 for recent publications vs #5,615 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

8.8 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

8.7 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.4 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

6.3 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	28	F	38%	41%	26%	0%	31%
Proceedings	26	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Monographs	23	F	0%	87%	2%	0%	28%
Edited Books	14	F	0%	41%	2%	0%	26%
Books	6	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	30%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	63%	9.4 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	52%	10.4 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	67%	3.4 / 5	Good
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	38%	2.6 / 7	Needs Work
Abstracts access	83%	5.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+11 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 35% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+10 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 32% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology RAS

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results