Cifra Ltd - Russian Agency for Digital Standardization (RADS)

Ekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk, Russia · Member ID: 19448 · 7,887 total works

Global Rank

#10,409

of 28,379

Percentile

Top 37%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+17

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#10407FISIP UPN Veteran Jakarta(20 pts)#10408Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan, Riset dan Inovasi Daerah Kabupaten Pati(20 pts)#10410Universitas Pakuan(20 pts)#10411Association for Promotion of Holistic Approach to Environment(20 pts)

Nexus Score

20/ 100

+9 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#9,180

3,152 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#10,409

4,735 works

Ranked #9,180 for recent publications vs #10,409 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

6.9 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

5.1 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.8 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

5.4 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Reference BooksTOP	49	D	30%	100%	100%	0%	30%
Dissertations	49	D	60%	100%	56%	0%	30%
Monographs	40	D	36%	87%	53%	0%	30%
Books	34	F	27%	64%	58%	0%	30%
Posted Content	30	F	44%	47%	60%	0%	5%
Proceedings	24	F	25%	31%	51%	3%	17%
Peer Reviews	20	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	0%
Journal Articles	19	F	27%	23%	11%	0%	29%
Reports	15	F	0%	53%	27%	0%	0%
Edited Books	6	F	3%	9%	20%	0%	2%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	51%	7.7 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	32%	6.4 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	80%	4.0 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	13%	1.3 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	86%	5.2 / 6	Excellent

Your reference books score 49 (Grade D) — strong work on your primary research outputs! The tips below reflect your aggregate coverage across all content types, where there's still room to grow.

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+13 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 28% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+11 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 26% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Cifra Ltd - Russian Agency for Digital Standardization (RADS)

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results