RN Score

Geophysical Survey of the Russian Academy of Sciences - GS RAS

Obninsk, Kaluga region, Russia · Member ID: 19389 · 526 total works

Nexus Score

25/ 100
F
-5 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#10,303

23

129 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#6,002

28

397 works

Ranked #10,303 for recent publications vs #6,002 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

13.9 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

2.6 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.4 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.1 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

5.6 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

93%
13.9 / 15Excellent

Update Policies

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

Similarity Check

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

ORCID Coverage

people

2%
0.3 / 20Poor

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

62%
3.1 / 5Good

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Award Numbers

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Licenses

access

0%
0.0 / 7Poor

Full-text Links

access

0%
0.0 / 7Poor

Abstracts

access

91%
5.5 / 6Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

2

Improve People

+13 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 13% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Access

+10 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 28% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 10 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
4/9/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.