Scientia Socialis Ltd

Siauliai, Siauliai, Lithuania · Member ID: 18684 · 2,819 total works

Global Rank

#2,279

of 28,364

Percentile

Top 8%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2277Helsinki University Press(40 pts)#2278Performance Studies International(40 pts)#2280Society for Philosophy of Emotion(40 pts)#2281MOLESTO: Edebiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi(40 pts)

Nexus Score

40/ 100

+16 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#1,905

348 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,279

2,471 works

Ranked #1,905 for recent publications vs #2,279 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

17.4 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

11.5 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

5.1 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

5.5 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
MonographsTOP	41	D	60%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Books	41	D	60%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Journal Articles	37	D	76%	36%	35%	0%	30%
Proceedings	26	F	53%	33%	0%	0%	30%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	92%	13.8 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	83%	4.2 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	90%	18.0 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	88%	4.4 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	16%	1.6 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	93%	5.6 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+10 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 28% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+7 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 34% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Scientia Socialis Ltd

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Access

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results