The Institute of the Osteopathy and Holistic Medicine

St.-Peterburg, St.-Peterburg, Russia · Member ID: 18257 · 420 total works

Global Rank

#312

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 1%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#310Science for Children Foundation(54 pts)#311Instituto Colombiano del Petroleo(54 pts)#313Author Gate Publications(54 pts)#314FSBEI of Higher Education SamSMU of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation(54 pts)

Nexus Score

54/ 100

+16 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#348

83 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#312

337 works

Ranked #348 for recent publications vs #312 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

18.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

12.1 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

4.8 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

19.3 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	51	C	70%	47%	33%	0%	98%
Edited Books	6	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	30%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	100%	15.0 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	86%	17.1 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	98%	5.9 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+7 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 32% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+4 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 60% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

The Institute of the Osteopathy and Holistic Medicine

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Similarity Check

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results