RN Score

SAGE Publications

Thousand Oaks, CA, United States · Member ID: 179 · 3,693,011 total works

Nexus Score

48/ 100
D
+28 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#368

62

248,075 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#765

34

3,444,936 works

Ranked #368 for recent publications vs #765 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

17.5 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

8.2 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.7 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

2.8 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

15.6 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
Journal ArticlesTOP39D
Posted Content24F
Journal Issues4F
Components2F
Book Sections1F
Monographs1F
Reference Entry1F
Book Chapters1F
Reference Books1F
Edited Books1F
Reports0F
Other0F
Books0F
Journals0F
Database0F
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

81%
12.1 / 15Excellent

Update Policies

provenance

85%
4.3 / 5Excellent

Similarity Check

provenance

90%
4.5 / 5Excellent

ORCID Coverage

people

73%
14.6 / 20Good

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

84%
4.2 / 5Excellent

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

27%
2.7 / 10Needs Work

Award Numbers

funding

22%
2.2 / 10Needs Work

Licenses

access

90%
6.3 / 7Excellent

Full-text Links

access

89%
6.2 / 7Excellent

Abstracts

access

76%
4.5 / 6Good

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Funding

+13 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 14% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
2

Improve People

+8 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 41% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Organizations

+8 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 24% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 7 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
4/15/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.