Uniwersytet Warminsko-Mazurski

Olsztyn, Poland · Member ID: 16792 · 6,567 total works

Global Rank

#2,850

of 28,379

Percentile

Top 10%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2848Medicos De America Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada(37 pts)#2849Nativa(37 pts)#2851El Colegio de la Frontera Sur(37 pts)#2852Poltava State Medical University (PSMU)(37 pts)

Nexus Score

36/ 100

+14 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,095

1,398 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,850

5,169 works

Ranked #3,095 for recent publications vs #2,850 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

11.8 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

9.3 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

15.0 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	32	F	42%	37%	0%	0%	70%
Monographs	31	F	20%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Reports	26	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Books	12	F	19%	6%	0%	0%	29%
Edited Books	6	F	10%	0%	0%	0%	15%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	62%	9.3 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	93%	4.6 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	63%	12.6 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	64%	4.5 / 7	Good
Full-text Links access	97%	6.8 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	94%	5.6 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+8 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 47% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Uniwersytet Warminsko-Mazurski

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve Provenance

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results