Scientific Societies

St. Paul, MN, United States · Member ID: 1665 · 54,355 total works

Global Rank

#3,461

of 28,501

Percentile

Top 12%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#3459Seismological Society of America (SSA)(34 pts)#3460Nihon University School of Dentistry(34 pts)#3462Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.(34 pts)#3463American Animal Hospital Association(34 pts)

Nexus Score

33/ 100

+23 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#2,892

5,289 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#3,461

49,066 works

Ranked #2,892 for recent publications vs #3,461 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

12.6 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

8.6 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.1 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

6.1 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

2.9 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	26	F	50%	25%	17%	16%	14%
Other	5	F	19%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Book Chapters	5	F	19%	0%	1%	0%	0%
Reports	3	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	13%
Monographs	1	F	3%	0%	2%	0%	0%
Report Component	1	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	6%
Proceedings	0	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	2%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	65%	9.8 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	83%	4.2 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	68%	13.6 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	78%	3.9 / 5	Good
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	52%	5.2 / 10	Good
Award Numbers funding	48%	4.8 / 10	Needs Work
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	52%	3.1 / 6	Good

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Access

+13 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 14% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+10 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 31% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+9 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 20% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Scientific Societies

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Access

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Enable Crossmark

Deposit Complete References

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results