Publishing House Sreda

Cheboksary, Chuvash Republic, Russia · Member ID: 16438 · 6,379 total works

Global Rank

#423

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 1%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#421SOBEST Associacao Brasileira de Estomaterapia(52 pts)#422State Institution of Science "Center of Innovative Healthcare Technologies" State Administrative Department(52 pts)#424Asian Spine Journal (ASJ)(52 pts)#425Universidad Tecnologica de Bolivar(52 pts)

Nexus Score

51/ 100

+6 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#879

2,670 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#423

3,709 works

Ranked #879 for recent publications vs #423 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

21.9 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

7.9 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

7.2 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.3 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

14.2 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	72	B	100%	88%	54%	4%	100%
Book Chapters	59	C	100%	41%	46%	1%	91%
Proceedings	55	C	100%	34%	50%	2%	75%
Monographs	14	F	0%	33%	48%	0%	0%
Books	6	F	0%	0%	42%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	90%	13.4 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	90%	4.5 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	89%	4.5 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	44%	8.8 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	95%	4.8 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	38%	3.8 / 10	Needs Work
Funder Registry funding	1%	0.1 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	1%	0.1 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	90%	6.3 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	89%	6.2 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	32%	1.9 / 6	Needs Work

Your journal articles score 72 (Grade B) — strong work on your primary research outputs! The tips below reflect your aggregate coverage across all content types, where there's still room to grow.

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 2% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+8 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 39% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+5 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 48% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Publishing House Sreda

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Increase ORCID Coverage

Include Abstracts

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results