IG UFRC RAS

Ufa, Bashkortostan, Russia · Member ID: 16093 · 297 total works

Global Rank

#5,966

of 28,379

Percentile

Top 21%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+10

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#5964Universitas Medan Area(26 pts)#5965FSBI Research Institute of Occupational Health RAMS(26 pts)#5967National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport(26 pts)#5968Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Notfallmedizin(26 pts)

Nexus Score

27/ 100

+30 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#4,354

83 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#5,966

214 works

Ranked #4,354 for recent publications vs #5,966 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

9.3 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

3.7 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.1 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.1 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

10.5 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
MonographsTOP	26	F	60%	0%	33%	0%	30%
Journal Articles	22	F	32%	12%	18%	0%	45%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	92%	13.7 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	36%	7.2 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	92%	4.6 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	1%	0.1 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	1%	0.1 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	67%	4.7 / 7	Good
Full-text Links access	78%	5.5 / 7	Good
Abstracts access	92%	5.5 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 1% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+12 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 19% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+11 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 37% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

IG UFRC RAS

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improve Provenance

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Crossmark

Enable Similarity Check

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results