RN Score

LLC Global Media Technology

Moscow, Russia · Member ID: 15949 · 1,919 total works

Nexus Score

49/ 100
D
+11 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#909

54

769 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#672

43

1,150 works

Ranked #909 for recent publications vs #672 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

12.6 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

13.9 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

4.6 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

17.7 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

92%
13.8 / 15Excellent

Update Policies

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

Similarity Check

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

ORCID Coverage

people

80%
16.0 / 20Excellent

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

99%
5.0 / 5Excellent

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Award Numbers

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Licenses

access

100%
7.0 / 7Excellent

Full-text Links

access

99%
6.9 / 7Excellent

Abstracts

access

93%
5.6 / 6Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

2

Improve Organizations

+8 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 30% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Provenance

+7 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 51% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 6 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
4/4/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.