Fundacion Centro de Estudios Andaluces

Sevilla, Spain · Member ID: 13504 · 384 total works

Global Rank

#6,564

of 28,608

Percentile

Top 23%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+12

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#6562Sam Houston State University Library(25 pts)#6563Massey University(25 pts)#6565University of Warwick(25 pts)#6566Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise(25 pts)

Nexus Score

25/ 100

+10 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#6,735

144 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#6,564

240 works

Ranked #6,735 for recent publications vs #6,564 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

6.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

5.7 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.8 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

3.1 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

7.2 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	50	C	47%	83%	0%	13%	95%
Books	22	F	20%	6%	1%	50%	30%
Edited Books	21	F	20%	0%	0%	50%	30%
Monographs	18	F	17%	40%	0%	0%	30%
Book Chapters	13	F	0%	0%	89%	0%	0%
Book Series	7	F	0%	0%	0%	17%	20%
Journal Issues	5	F	19%	0%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	23%	3.4 / 15	Needs Work
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	56%	2.8 / 5	Good
ORCID Coverage people	40%	7.9 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	37%	1.8 / 5	Needs Work
ROR IDs organizations	37%	3.7 / 10	Needs Work
Funder Registry funding	11%	1.1 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	8%	0.8 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	41%	2.9 / 7	Needs Work
Full-text Links access	41%	2.9 / 7	Needs Work
Abstracts access	40%	2.4 / 6	Needs Work

Your journal articles score 50 (Grade C) — strong work on your primary research outputs! The tips below reflect your aggregate coverage across all content types, where there's still room to grow.

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+14 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 24% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+13 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 15% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+10 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 28% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Fundacion Centro de Estudios Andaluces

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Crossmark

Increase ORCID Coverage

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results