RN Score

Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design

Kyiv, Ukraine · Member ID: 12310 · 1,797 total works

Global Rank

#10,325

of 28,379

Percentile

Top 36%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nexus Score

20/ 100
F
-3 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#13,267

19

528 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#10,325

21

1,269 works

Ranked #13,267 for recent publications vs #10,325 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

4.3 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

2.7 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

12.9 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
Journal ArticlesTOP23F
Monographs13F
Edited Books11F
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

0%
0.0 / 15Poor

Update Policies

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

Similarity Check

provenance

89%
4.5 / 5Excellent

ORCID Coverage

people

1%
0.2 / 20Poor

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Award Numbers

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Licenses

access

33%
2.3 / 7Needs Work

Full-text Links

access

89%
6.2 / 7Excellent

Abstracts

access

91%
5.4 / 6Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Provenance

+16 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 17% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
2

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

3

Improve People

+13 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 13% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 8 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
4/9/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.