Laser Institute of America

Orlando, FL, United States · Member ID: 1208 · 8,800 total works

Global Rank

#259

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 1%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#257Unidad Educativa Mateo Celestino Espinoza Castro(56 pts)#258Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(55 pts)#260American Cancer Society(55 pts)#261The Editorial Office of Gut and Liver(55 pts)

Nexus Score

54/ 100

+35 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#77

374 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#259

8,426 works

Ranked #77 for recent publications vs #259 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

24.1 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

10.7 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

4.9 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

7.4 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

7.2 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	49	D	93%	39%	33%	27%	36%
Proceedings	34	F	94%	0%	32%	0%	30%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	99%	14.9 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	100%	20.0 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	71%	7.1 / 10	Good
Award Numbers funding	68%	6.8 / 10	Good
Licenses access	20%	1.4 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	12%	0.9 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	99%	5.9 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+9 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 37% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+9 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 36% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+7 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 33% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Laser Institute of America

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Access

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results