Ponteditora

Funchal, Madeira, Portugal · Member ID: 11609 · 603 total works

Global Rank

#5,950

of 28,379

Percentile

Top 21%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+11

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#5948Uptodate In Medicine LLC(26 pts)#5949Cycling Research Center(26 pts)#5951Ikatan Ahli Informatika Indonesia (IAII)(26 pts)#5952Iraqi Center for Cancer and Medical Genetics Research(26 pts)

Nexus Score

26/ 100

+6 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#7,145

157 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#5,950

446 works

Ranked #7,145 for recent publications vs #5,950 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

9.1 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

13.3 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

3.2 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	27	F	37%	67%	0%	0%	24%
Edited Books	20	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	0%
Journal Issues	1	F	2%	0%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	74%	11.1 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	82%	16.4 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	18%	1.1 / 6	Poor

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+13 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 16% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Ponteditora

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Access

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Award/Grant Numbers

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results