Mattering Press

Manchester, Lancashire, United Kingdom · Member ID: 11481 · 24 total works

Global Rank

#493

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 2%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#491Minin University(51 pts)#492The Korean Child Neurology Society(51 pts)#494FGI Federal Centre for Animal Health (FGI ARRIA)(51 pts)#495Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Intheos Surakarta(51 pts)

Nexus Score

50/ 100

+49 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#41

1 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#493

23 works

Ranked #41 for recent publications vs #493 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

6.7 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

13.9 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

10.1 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

5.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

14.7 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Edited BooksTOP	36	D	18%	62%	46%	4%	55%
Monographs	22	F	13%	22%	33%	0%	47%
Books	3	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	15%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	0%	0.0 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	100%	20.0 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	100%	10.0 / 10	Excellent
Funder Registry funding	100%	10.0 / 10	Excellent
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	100%	6.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+13 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 27% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+11 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 25% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+2 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 70% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Mattering Press

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Include Award/Grant Numbers

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results