Universidad de Zaragoza

Zaragoza, Spain · Member ID: 11292 · 9,923 total works

Global Rank

#5,591

of 28,501

Percentile

Top 20%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+11

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#5589Revista Temas em Educacao e Saude(27 pts)#5590LPPM Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang(27 pts)#5592Brandeis University(27 pts)#5593SCAD Independent(27 pts)

Nexus Score

26/ 100

+15 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#5,596

1,293 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#5,591

8,630 works

Ranked #5,596 for recent publications vs #5,591 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

6.1 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

3.8 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

1.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.4 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

15.1 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	23	F	20%	8%	3%	1%	79%
Monographs	20	F	0%	85%	0%	0%	17%
Edited Books	17	F	0%	65%	1%	0%	17%
Books	2	F	0%	6%	0%	0%	4%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	26%	4.0 / 15	Needs Work
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	85%	4.2 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	33%	6.6 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	15%	0.7 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	12%	1.2 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	4%	0.4 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	4%	0.4 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	83%	5.8 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	85%	6.0 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	78%	4.7 / 6	Good

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 2% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+14 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 24% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+12 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 19% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Universidad de Zaragoza

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results