Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland

Cleveland, OH, United States · Member ID: 11044 · 1,605 total works

Global Rank

#3,276

of 28,501

Percentile

Top 11%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#3274Scientific Scholar(35 pts)#3275Revista de Engenharia e Pesquisa Aplicada(35 pts)#3277V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University(35 pts)#3278Medicina Veterinaria (UFRPE)(35 pts)

Nexus Score

35/ 100

+32 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#1,320

186 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#3,276

1,419 works

Ranked #1,320 for recent publications vs #3,276 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

8.4 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

12.7 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

9.2 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

4.6 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Posted ContentTOP	51	C	39%	100%	100%	0%	30%
Journal Articles	39	D	39%	78%	50%	0%	33%
Reports	20	F	21%	41%	36%	0%	8%
Database	10	F	0%	0%	67%	0%	0%
Report Series	2	F	3%	0%	8%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	78%	11.8 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	88%	17.6 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	93%	4.7 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	93%	9.3 / 10	Excellent
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	20%	1.4 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	99%	6.0 / 6	Excellent

Your posted content score 51 (Grade C) — strong work on your primary research outputs! The tips below reflect your aggregate coverage across all content types, where there's still room to grow.

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+12 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 34% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+11 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 23% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Add Funder Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Add License Information

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results