Associacao Brasileira de Linguistica

Brazil · Member ID: 10825 · 1,450 total works

Global Rank

#2,636

of 28,379

Percentile

Top 9%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2634Institucion Universitaria de Envigado(38 pts)#2635James Cook University(38 pts)#2637Journal of Mosaic Research(38 pts)#2638TP National Information Satellite System(38 pts)

Nexus Score

38/ 100

-4 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#4,877

239 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,636

1,211 works

Ranked #4,877 for recent publications vs #2,636 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

7.3 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

15.0 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.4 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

1.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

12.1 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	43	D	46%	63%	12%	5%	82%
Books	26	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Peer Reviews	22	F	0%	86%	30%	0%	0%
Edited Books	21	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	3%
Monographs	13	F	0%	33%	0%	0%	30%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	2%	0.3 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	17%	0.8 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	53%	2.6 / 5	Good
ORCID Coverage people	93%	18.6 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	60%	3.0 / 5	Good
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	8%	0.8 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	4%	0.4 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	53%	3.7 / 7	Good
Full-text Links access	53%	3.7 / 7	Good
Abstracts access	37%	2.2 / 6	Needs Work

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+15 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 5% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+13 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 29% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+10 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 16% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Associacao Brasileira de Linguistica

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Abstracts

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results